Walking up to school this morning, my son said ‘I love the sky’. You can see why:
It’s the beginning of spring on this side of the world, and Sydney celebrates with days in the mid 20s. Members of the Cloud Appreciation Society would have found little joy this morning. After a week of rain, it’s nothing but blue skies.
I was thinking about this moment of looking upwards together while reading The Taylorisation of Time: An effective strategy in the struggle to ‘manage’ work and life? from the Annals of Leisure Research.
Pat Thomson recently blogged about ideas for keeping a reading journal on the last thing you read, a reading that has stayed with you, something written really well and something in the media that speaks to your research. Her twenty questions include:
- What’s the first thing you remember about this text? Write a sentence.
- Did the text give you an idea? Write a sentence.
- Does this book or paper connect with something else that you’ve read? Write a sentence.
- How does this writing differ from other things you’ve read? Write a sentence.
The Taylorisation of Time uses data from the Australian Longitudinal Study of Women’s Health, a longitudinal survey of over 57,000 women in three age cohorts (18-23, 45-50 and 70-75) which began in 1996 (another 17,000 women aged 18-23 were recruited to form a new cohort in 2012/13). I also read two other articles that draw on the same data set: ‘‘Melt Down’: Young women’s talk of time and its implications for health, wellbeing and identity in late modernity’ and ‘Time Pressure, Satisfaction with Leisure, and Health Among Australian Women’.
The outcome of asking women about their time is not surprising: a lot of Australian women feel pressured and anxious about competing demands. Middle-aged mothers of pre-school children who are working full-time are the most likely to describe themselves as “frequently rushed”.
- “I feel totally out of control most of the time. I feel … that life is a rollercoaster and you just get on there and you just do it.”
- “The most high pressured time of the day is trying to get out the door in the morning. Work is fine; the rest of my life is totally chaotic. Work has its routines, family life is unpredictable.”
- “Between chauffeuring them to and from school on the way to work … I’m supposed to have a life which doesn’t exist”
- “We’re trying to be perfect. Like, I feel guilty if my kids don’t get a proper meal.”
- “I think with work … your children are treated like a commodity … a package you drop off at school, but there is no provision for the package losing a shoe, or getting sick, feeling like a cuddle, dawdling over breakfast…”
For all that everyone has the same quantity (1440 minutes a day), time pressure differentiates based on individual, cultural and political moderators (gender, age, employment, health, ability and caring responsibilities being obvious examples).
The ‘Taylorisation’ of the title refers to scientific management of efficient workflows for productivity applied to family life. Think precise calendars, lists of tasks, household routines, rosters or timetables, and rewards or incentives. This work is overseen by a ‘time and motion’ expert who manages the temporal portfolios of individual family members. Sound familiar?
There were interesting insights, notably:
The ‘time budget’ mentality may exacerbate rather than alleviate stress and the flawed nature of the ‘time and motion’ approach is further exposed in the mismatch of children’s temporal rhythms to those of adults.
Reading this article, I was reminded of a poem by Rosemary Dobson (Australian poet, 1920-2012) we read in high school:
Wanting to be myself, alone,
Between the lit house and the town
I took the road, and at the bridge
Turned back and walked the way I’d come.
Three times I took that lonely stretch,
Three times the dark trees closed me round,
The night absolved me of my bonds;
Only my footsteps held the ground.
My mother and my daughter slept,
One life behind and one before,
And I that stood between denied
Their needs in shutting-to the door.
And walking up and down the road
Knew myself, separate and alone,
Cut off from human cries, from pain,
And love that grows about the bone.
Too brief illusion! Thrice for me
I heard the cock crow on the hill,
And turned the handle of the door
Thinking I knew his meaning well.
As a group of 15 year olds who had rarely subjugated our needs in service of others, we had little insight into the brief respite described in this poem.
This week, I want to experience more moments of sky-gazing interruption.
If you are not quite there, you may want to align your leisure activities with academia in some way. For example, watch The Bachelor (now popular with academics thanks to a hunky astrophysicist) or read some novels featuring academic characters (I’ve just added Dear Committee Members to my reading list).
I can also recommend the ABC’s comedy series Utopia, set in the office of the government’s National Building Authority. A word of warning: watching the inner working of bureaucracy can be uncomfortably familiar.
5 thoughts on “Look up”
Adding Dear Committee Members to my reading list – sounds wonderful! Loved the quote about kids being commodities who lose shoes.
I watched some of the new series of Utopia the other day and it had that effect (of being overly familiar). It was hard to watch at times, laughing as I was cringing, and the (very funny) levels of incompetence on screen. I do love how the show brings into the tent office workers from so many sectors, and anyone who has been part of a bureaucracy (or who has had to deal with such). It’s a huge group!
Thanks Tseen – great point about Utopia. I hope we both *enjoy* Dear Committee Members.
I’m so sick of almost none of my time being my own. And the more my time is squeezed (the good bits) and stretched (the working bits) the less efficient I am with either mode.
Fortunately, I have only three years and 8 days of this to go. Then it will all be mine. Well, mine and my grandchildren’s.
Counting time, Cathy.
Pingback: Goals for today | The Slow Academic